Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

This piece masterfully connects political economy with cycle mechanics in a way most commentary misses. Your observation that David Sacks acknowledging hyperscaler capex as essential to avoiding recession marks an implicit policy shift is spot on, because it reveals how AI infrastructure has been reframed from private investment to strategic national priority. When you note the administration sees this as comparable to the Manhattan Project, you're identifying the moment when industrial policy becomes explicit and the state begins treating compute buildout as geopolitical imperative rather than market outcome. The SLR adjustment you describe, particularly Miran's push to fully exempt Treasuries from leverage calculations, isn't just technical plumbing. It's creating absorption capacity precisely because hyperscaler capex sustains near-term sentiment but doesn't directly solve federal funding. The interplay here is revealing: AI infrastructure delays macro deterioration, which buys time for regulatory shifts that reopen debt absorption channels. What makes this arrangement fragile is that each pillar depends on the others staying intact. If capex guidance weakens, sentiment breaks. If Treasury demand doesn't materialize through the SLR pathway, rates climb despite Fed posturing. The system is balanced on synchronized execution across domains that rarely coordinate cleanly, which means when one piece shifts the othersmove quickly.

No posts

Ready for more?